The Center's Mission
The Center for the Study of Electromagnetic Fields and Radiation was established to provide a skeptical perspective on the effects of electromagnetic radiation exposure. This skeptism is two-fold: (1) skepticism of those who baselessly claim that wifi routers cause cancer, and (2) skepticism of the those who vigorously defend the status quo despite ever-increasing levels of electromagnetic radiation exposure. The Center's postition is that both categories of claims must be addressed by the evidence, for that is how scientific inquiry ought to be conducted, not by assumptions and certainly not through fear. The Center aims to challenge both sides and seek the truth for the benefit of the public.
Featured Articles
-
Editorial: Electromagnetic Radiation — Friend or Foe?
The debate over electromagnetic radiation exposure continues to rage across the internet. Are concerns excessive or warranted? What does the science have to say about it?
-
Commentary: Evaluating the Merits of the Blushield EMF Protection Device
Many people today are looking for ways to decrease EMF exposure. The Blushield is a device that claims to do just that. Is such protection merited, and on what physical principle is the device based?
-
Commentary: The Effect of 2.4 GHz Frequency EMR on Chick Embryos and SH-SY5Y Cells
Wi-Fi commonly operates at the 2.4 GHz frequency. What effect does exposure to this frequency of electromagnetic radiation have on biological matter? Is there cause for concern?
-
Commentary: The Effect of 5G (700 MHz Frequency) Radiation on the Reproductive Health of Female Rats
As 5G technologies become more prevalent, is there cause for concern? Does 5G tech lead to infertility or DNA damage? Does this exposure lead to an increase in the body's oxidative stress response?
Artificial Intelligence Usage
With the advent of artificial intelligence technologies, it is important to note that we do not use AI for the generation of scientific content. All articles are written by humans, never by AI models. Some images or otherwise superfluous aesthetic details may be derived from aritificial intelligence, but this will never affect the quality or content of our scientific analysis.